Engineered for Client Asset Protection
Auxite's infrastructure is designed around a singular principle: client assets must remain protected regardless of what happens to the operating entities. This is not a marketing promise — it is an architectural requirement.
Five Pillars of Protection
Each pillar represents a distinct layer of structural protection designed to safeguard client assets.
No single entity controls governance, custody, and client assets simultaneously.
Bankruptcy Remoteness
Client metals are structured to exist outside the balance sheet of operating entities. In the event of corporate distress, client assets are not available to creditors of the operating company.
"Client assets are held in trust structures and are not recorded as corporate assets of the operating entities."
Legal Segregation
Each client allocation is identifiable and traceable within the custody framework. Assets are not commingled with house positions or pooled with other client holdings in ways that would compromise individual ownership claims.
"Allocated metals remain identifiable to each client within the custody structure."
Custody Independence
Physical metals are held with independent third-party vault providers. The operating entities do not have unilateral access to client metals without proper authorization protocols.
"Vaulting partners operate under established security and audit protocols independent of Auxite operating entities."
Governance Oversight
No single entity or individual controls all three critical functions: governance, custody, and allocation. This separation of duties is designed to prevent concentration of operational risk.
"Multi-entity architecture ensures no single point of control over client assets."
Operational Separation
Different functions are performed by different entities across multiple jurisdictions. This geographic and legal distribution enhances operational resilience and reduces single-jurisdiction risk.
"Hong Kong, Dubai, and Istanbul entities each serve distinct operational roles within a unified governance framework."
Protection Architecture
Structural separation is designed to protect client assets at every operational layer.
Precious metals are held within independent custody structures separate from operating entities.
Institutional Questions — Answered
The questions risk officers and compliance teams ask first.
"What happens to my assets if the company fails?"
Client metals are structured as client property, not company assets. They are designed to be bankruptcy-remote and would not be available to creditors in the event of operating entity distress.
"Who actually holds the physical metal?"
Physical metals are held with independent third-party vault providers operating under established custody and security protocols. Auxite operating entities coordinate allocation but do not physically custody client metals.
"How do I verify my allocation?"
Each allocation is recorded on a verifiable ledger with corresponding vault records. Clients can request allocation statements and audit-ready documentation through standard institutional processes.
"What counterparty risk am I taking?"
The multi-entity structure is designed to minimize counterparty concentration. No single entity controls governance, custody, and allocation simultaneously. Client exposure is to the allocated metals themselves, not to company credit.
"Is this structure bankruptcy remote?"
Yes. Client metals remain outside the balance sheet of operating entities. Precious metals are held within independent custody structures separate from operating entities, designed to survive corporate events affecting the operator.
Regulatory Positioning
Auxite provides infrastructure for physically backed digital metals. The group does not operate as a deposit-taking institution, broker-dealer, or investment advisor.
Activities are structured to align with applicable regulatory frameworks across operating jurisdictions. Detailed regulatory disclosures are available during institutional due diligence processes.
Due Diligence Materials Available
Institutional counterparties can request detailed documentation including custody agreements, governance frameworks, and audit procedures.
Available upon qualified institutional request.